The Turkish government failed to attract the expected crowd of thousands of worshipers from around the world to the first Mass in almost a century, held at the Holy Cross Church in Akhtamar Island on Sept. 19. Only a few hundred Armenians showed up, mostly from Istanbul.
Turkey failed miserably in trying to deceive world opinion into believing that it is tolerant towards Armenians. Eventually, it became obvious that Turkish leaders were more interested in putting on a political show than allowing a religious ceremony in a thousand-year-old Armenian house of worship.
I wrote a column three years ago criticizing the Turkish government for converting the Holy Cross Church into a state museum. At the time, I urged Turkish officials to 1) place a cross on the church’s dome; 2) designate it as a church rather than a museum, and allow regular celebration of Divine Liturgy; and 3) revert ownership of the church to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul instead of placing it under the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
Earlier this year, the Turkish government promised to place a cross on the dome of the church and allow services to be performed there on Sept. 19. I urged Armenians not to participate, knowing that Turkish officials’ true intent was to stage a political show under the guise of religious ceremonies.
An intense debate ensued among Armenians on whether to boycott or attend the church services. Articles exposing Turkey’s sinister plans did little to settle the controversy. Making matters worse, the Holy See of Etchmiadzin and the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem announced plans to send representatives to the Akhtamar church, although the Catholicosate of Cilicia declined to participate.
Finally, a lucky break! The Turkish government came to the rescue. A few weeks before the scheduled ceremony, a Turkish official announced that it would not be possible to place the promised cross atop the church, making the ridiculous excuse of “technical difficulties.”
Prime Minister Erdogan was caught in a dilemma. Had he allowed the cross to be placed on the dome, he would have scored points with world public opinion, but would have lost crucial votes in the hotly contested Sept. 12 referendum on constitutional reforms.
The cross finally saved the day! The Holy See of Etchmiadzin canceled its plans to send representatives to Akhtamar. The Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem did likewise. Tour operators called off their arrangements to take large numbers of Armenian worshipers to Lake Van. As a result, Turkey lost the propaganda campaign and considerable income.
In a last ditch effort to increase attendance, a few days before Sept. 19, Erdogan’s office sent invitations to the Armenia media, offering all-expenses-paid visits to Akhtamar, including free round-trip airfare, hotel accommodations, and meals. Another 50 Armenian commentators and analysts received similar invitations, all of whom refused to go because of Turkey’s refusal to install the cross.
Inadvertently, the Turks forced most Armenians to do the right thing and cancel their visits to the Holy Cross Church. Interestingly, the Turkish government behaved similarly when it declined to ratify the Armenia-Turkey protocols, thereby safeguarding Armenia’s interests.
While the Armenian public, civic groups, and some political parties opposed the Turkish plans at Akhtamar, the Armenian government remained remarkably silent. For unknown reasons, Turkey did not invite Armenian officials to the Holy Cross ceremonies. In view of the embarrassing games Ankara played with the Armenia-Turkey protocols and the subsequent collapse of “soccer diplomacy,” it appears that Armenia’s leaders were not too eager to join Turks in yet another ploy.
Regrettably, Armenians wasted far too much time and energy arguing with each other about going to Akhtamar. This distraction prevented them from organizing protests in major capitals to inform the world about the long history of Turkish atrocities, destruction of thousands of churches, and occupation of historic Armenian lands.
However, the boycott of the ceremonies because of the missing cross caught the attention of the international media. Ironically, Turkish officials helped further undermine their own cause by placing the cross on the ground next to the Holy Cross Church, in full view of the public and TV cameras.
The Turkish government has now promised to place the cross atop the church in six weeks. Regardless of what Turkey decides to do with the cross, Armenians should pursue their own course of action, rather than simply react to the petty games of Turkish officials.
At this point, the only announcement Armenians are interested in hearing from Ankara is the return of the Holy Cross Church to the Armenian Patriarchate of Turkey.




Karekin
September 28, 2010
The fight for Anatolia was/is like a fight by two (perhaps more) dogs over the same bone. While the Ottomans lost Greece, Romania, Albania, Bulgaria when it came to east Anatolia, the ancient homeland of the Armenians, the Ottomans – financially desperate and backed into a corner, acted out against their most loyal and useful subjects. It wasn’t the first time in history that an empire acted out in such a bloody way; the Spanish conquistadors were equally brutal in the Americas. The point is, it didn’t have to end this way, but it did. Bad decisions and choices were made by people on all sides, yet other than the largely unarmed Armenians themselves, no one worked on their behalf, so they were doomed. Trapped in Turkey, they were sitting ducks for the brutality of the CUP megalomaniacs. If anyone had actually lifted a finger to help the Armenians, and many had the chance to do so, perhaps the outcome would have been very different. I might still be living on a farm in Anatolia and Turkey would have become even more cosmopolitan and diverse, and would have prospered many years ago as a result. When war, revolution, greed, power, religion and racism come together the results are often disasterous for almost everyone involved. That is the sad fact of human existence.
Karo
September 28, 2010
The Spanish conquistadors were not equally brutal in the Americas. They were outsiders converting Native Americans and profiteering at the same time often in brutal ways, whereas Ottoman Armenians have been wiped out by their own government at the time represented by the CUP megalomaniacs.
But CUP is long gone. What prevents modern-day “tolerant” and “democratic” Turkish governments to admit the crime of their predecessors?
Karo
September 28, 2010
Isn’t apologizing for a wrongdoing also a part of human existence, Karekin?
Karekin
September 28, 2010
Karo – An apology will undoubtedly happen if/when the proper atmosphere is created wherein the apology can survive the test of time. Little by little, this is happening right now, as we speak. No one is suggesting that an apology should not happen, of course, it would be appropriate and is absolutely necessary, but the conditions must be right and to a degree, we need to be participants in helping to foster such conditions. We need to ask ourselves, once that does happen, then what? Will Armenians be able to receive such an apology graciously? After so much noise making, can our compatriots calm down and shift their focus? Will they be open to commemorating the genocide with Turks, rather than encouraging an adversarial relationship forever? Will they be able to replace demands with the same kind of tolerance they expect from the other side? In the face of an official apology, will they be able to move on?
arx
September 28, 2010
Dear Karekin, I wish all Armenians can think little bit more deeply and understand this issue from other aspects. It seems to me that we are all having Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, with deep resentment,anger, and, unfortunately hate ruling our thoughts and behaviors. When are we going to start our healing process?I think some leaders are doing this impossible with their psychological problems. First of all they need to have very strong personality with perfect judgement, and spiritual awakening. When are we going to have very bright and intellectual leaders who are able to lead us, instead repeat the same old songs over and over again.This is a new era. we need new ideas and leaders.
Karo
September 28, 2010
Karekin – Are you suggesting that it is the victims who should create the proper atmosphere for apology? This is unheard of. Many people asked but you never elaborated: HOW? If after 1915 until the present time ordinary Turks’ brains have been stuffed with historically distortive and Armenophobic schemes, how can we, the victims, being in a disproportional ratio in terms of population, “foster conditions” for their apology? Haven’t you come across comments posted here by the Turks? Sheer denialism, government propaganda elevated to the level of distortion of history that’s being taught at schools and universities. How do you change that? Or even if you miraculously can, how many more decades do you need for that? Don’t you think it’s the prerogative of their government, not us, to create an atmosphere for apology? You agree that “little by little this is happening right now,” but our demands for justice haven’t subsided, on the contrary, they’ve become stronger. Then why is it happening little by little as we speak? I’ll tell you why. Because it is exactly these demands that are being recognized as just by the increasing number of foreign governments, international organizations, professional organizations, advocacy groups, scholars, and Nobel Prize laureates, and the possibility of such players as the US, UK, and Israel to recognize the genocide that influence the Turks to make insignificant, essentially superficial, gestures. In other words, when Turks apologize they’ll do it not out of humanism, compassion, or remorse. They’ll do it out of inevitability imposed on them by the international community. Noone knows the Turks better than the Armenians. As for “once that apology does happen, then what?” I’m pretty sure it’ll be easier for Armenians to move on knowing that the murderer has repented. It’ll also relieve us from the victim complex from which almost all of us suffer.
Boyajian
September 28, 2010
Arx, forgiveness awaits those who apologize for their wrongs, that’s when the healing begins.
Karo
September 28, 2010
Well, arx, and I wish that all Turks can think little bit deeper and understand the issue from aspects other than their denialist, distortionist government have been stuffing their brains for decades. I can understand why Armenians would have “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder,” after all we lost 1.5 million human beings, a million of others forcibly expelled from or fled their ancestral homeland, three-quarters of our lands now occupied, most of our cultural edifices desecrated, our properties stolen, our houses given to Balkan Turks and Kurds, our bank accounts and insurance indemnities appropriated, and the crime of genocide never admitted and apologized for. What “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder” the Turks are having at the hands of Armenians? Please enlighten me. “When are we going to start our healing process,” you ask? Whenever your state admits the guilt for committing genocide and apologizes to Armenians.
zeynep
September 28, 2010
Hello.
It breaks my heart to read this article which is quite demeaning to the Turks– as if we are not human, our ‘otherness’ is so complete. I myself am a descendant of the genocide of Tatars in Crimea, our historical homeland, by means of eastern Europe. Muslim names had to be changed, our identities hidden. Unlike my parents, I was incredibly fortunate to grow up in Istanbul, in freedom. We focused on our future, not our past victimization. Of families broken. Relatives lost. Gone. We decided to survive. It was not allowed in my family to talk about the past– I only learned the details and pain of it slowly, from bits and pieces, growing up. I never thought of hating the Russians; thinking them as the ‘other’. What use was it..
Growing up in Istanbul our next door neighbor was an Armenian family, and still is, and the wife is best friends with my mom. My boyfriend was an Istanbul Greek. Most of the kids I went to highschool with were Jewish. I had such wonderful memories with them, of love and affection. They are still my family.
Only after I came to United States and approached my fellow Armenians that I received so much animosity, if not outright hatred. The irony was that a majority of these people had never met a Turk before; such strong was their racism. I don’t carry such hatred towards Russians. We Tatars decided to move on, not let our pain and suffering define who we are. I am personally grateful to the Turkish government to accept my family, and help me grow up, not with hatred in my heart, but with love and an open heart for fellow humans. Maybe one day you will go to Istanbul; or extend kindness to a Turk you meet on the streets of LA or Yerivan; perhaps it is someone like me; who is more like you than you’d think in terms of family history.
Karekin
September 29, 2010
Some people here need to learn the lessons of positive reinforcement. Let’s ask a few questions: Do you have kids? If you do, are they perfect, or have they broken a vase or dropped a bottle of milk, or do they have a mental or physical problem? Have you tried demanding that they do this or that? Have you chastised them on a daily basis for not being perfect or what you want them to be? Have you threatened them? Have you hit them? Screamed at them? Demeaned them publicly? Insulted them and their grandparents? Have you attempted to cause them pain to get your demands met? If you answered yes to any of these questions, I’d like to know if you were able to change your kid, or, did you meet some resistance? Did your wife encourage you or did you do this alone? The fact is that the more hurt you attempt to inflict the less likely it is that you will see positive change in the direction you want. Sadly, if you don’t realize this fact with your own children, you will not be able to understand how to change the dynamic that currently exists between Armenians and Turks. Then again, maybe some of us don’t really want to see a change take place…maybe, just maybe, the status quo is alot more comfortable than change.
gaytzag palandjian
September 29, 2010
It started out with the theme,”who won..” i.e., the Akhtamar Pilgrimage issue..
Actually ,we did the Armenians.More ab out this further below,now to Karo ,karekin Arx et al.
The comparison between the Spanish Conquistadores and the ottoman turks is erroneous of course .Latter were with an origin of -in short- uneducated wild plunderers,whereas the Conquistadores and or the future Anglo-French portuguese,Dutch and other such were DISCOVERERS,let us say NOT with intention of committing Genocide!!! so no comparison possible.
As to why I believe we won,at the very least the millions who watched the “Show” did realize a bit that this was occurring in a land (not Zululand) that some call Anatolia,but better informed West Armenia.Moreover latter know quite well that the turks are not Christians ,so if those who not quite acquainted with the Armenian CASE/Cause, or call it issue whatever, would learn that these are not turks who came there as Pilgrims,but Chrisitians…what christians/if they delved further into issue/ Armenians!!!!
Thence,it was a no charge propaganda for our Cause and the turks did not win with their \@SHOW…
Next _ they are to perform the 2nd act at Ani, so they anounced yesterday on T.V. celebrating a @NAMAZ@ wait and see…
Karekin
September 29, 2010
Whether the victims were native Americans or native Anatolians, the result is the same….the conquerors conquered, established their empires, pllaged the land and vanquished the conquered. In both cases, the conqueror sat like an octopus on its victim. the Americas, Spain eventually lost political control, but culturally their legacy remains in a big way: language, culture, religion, architecture. The natives are still there, speaking the language of their conquerors. In Turkey, the loss of empire resulted in Turkey for the Turks and a fascist regime determined to suppress any expression of ’non-Turkish’ culture. I agree w/ Gaytzag that we gained alot w/ the Akhtamar badarak, in that a huge amount of publicity was brought to Armenian culture, architecture and history thru photos, interviews and the press. When the sun shines, you must make hay - because if you wait, you may just get another rainy day.
Karo
September 29, 2010
Again, Karekin – Look deeper at what you wrote: “Whether the victims were native Americans or native Anatolians, the result is the same….” No, the result is not the same. Native Americans continue to live on their lands and they’ve been harassed by the conquerors, i.e. outsiders. In Asia Minor which you erroneously call “Anatolia” no indigenous Armenians or other Christians remain and they were wiped out by their own, not some foreign, government in 1915. Big difference.
Karo
September 29, 2010
Zeynep – We’re not discussing here social relationships that may form between different ethnic and religious groups. Of course, there may be good neighborly relations between an individual Turk and an individual Armenian, or an individual Turkish family and an individual Greek family, as you described. But what does this have to do with the crime that the Ottoman Turkish government has committed against their own citizens of Armenian descent and with our demand for justice? The whole Armenian population and their ancestral lands in the Ottoman empire were wiped out from the face of the earth in what the increasing number of foreign governments, international organizations, scholars, and groups recognize as genocide, i.e. deliberate annihilation of a particular ethnic, national, racial, and religious group.
I re-read the article trying to locate where you saw any demeaning words addressed to the modern-day Turks. Sorry, but you’ll have to refer me to those parts in the text when it says that Turks are “not human.” But we’d for sure say that Turkey’s Ittihadist forefathers were not human. To exterminate in millions innocent women, children and the elders in the most barbarous forms is not human.
As a victim of the genocide by the Turks, I sympathize with the pain of Crimean Tatars. However, Crimean Tatars, as well as some other peoples in the former Soviet Union, were mostly forcibly deported from Crimea under the Stalin regime and relocated elsewhere, they were not exterminated and their case hardly fall under the definition of genocide as given by the 1948 UN Genocide Convention. Whereas Armenians were not only forcibly deported from their ancestral lands but regularly massacred en route. In contrast to the Tatars, Armenians’ deportations did not result in their relocation elsewhere. They resulted in near-total death for the most of them. Annihilation of the Armenians was a part of the government policy Ottomanization of the empire, not a part of Stalinist crazy nationality policy of relocating minorities or placing them under the jurisdiction of majority populations.
On an individual level, you may claim that you were “fortunate to grow up in Istanbul, in freedom.” After all, it’s your fellow Muslim country and you were not harassed in Turkey as all Christian minorities – Greeks, Assyrians, and Armenians – were, none of them now exists in Turkey. On an individual level, you can be grateful to Turkey to accept your family and help you grow up. Just like us, we’re proud and grateful citizens of the United States, but we’re also proud Armenians. But in contrast to you, we’ve become a Diaspora scattered all over the world not by our own choice. Why wouldn’t we continue to live on the lands of our ancestors who inhabited them for 4000 years?
Please understand: Armenians don’t carry hatred towards modern-day ordinary Turks. We abhor Turkish governments that after 1915 deny the crime of their predecessor Ittihadist government that committed the crime of genocide and for 95 years had no courage to apologize to us. We’d like to move on, but how can you move on knowing that the murderer-state hasn’t repented? How can you build relationship with your neighbor next-door “with love and open heart” knowing that he continues to deny that he killed your mother, raped your sister, beheaded your brother, and slit off an unborn from his mother’s womb, just like Turks did to Armenians in 1915?
I also hope that one day we would go Constantinople and exchange kindness with Turks, one day after their government showed humanity to the Armenian nation by apologizing for the crime.
P.S. By the way, the capital of Armenia is Yerevan, a name derived from 5000 year-old Urartian Armenian city of Erebuni. It’s not “Yerivan.” Cheers.
Murat
September 29, 2010
Karekin laments: “I might still be living on a farm in Anatolia and Turkey would have become even more cosmopolitan and diverse, and would have prospered many years ago as a result.”
Wishful thinking at best. Take a look at the map of Sevres and what was to be left for Turks if the story had ended some other way. Anatolia would have been left as a cocophony of small “princehoods”, fighting for resources, for access, for alliences… surely a fertile ground for WWIII. Oh, yes in that utopic land, the majority of the population, Muslims that is, would have to be eliminated one way or another to make room for a Greater Armenia. Non-Kurds would have to cleansed of Kurdistan, non-Greeks out of Western Anatolia. I seriously doubt if Karekin would have any opportunity to enjoy anything there.
In hindsight, a lot of things could have been done differently. Ottomans paid a heavy price for their mistakes. Ottomans are history, but Dashnaks are still here. Armenians could have thrown their lot with their own countrymen, not with Czar’s Russia for example. Not a single Armenian revolutionary faced the music for their crimes against humanity, including their own.
People who demand of others to face their past, should start doing the same in their home now.
Murat
September 29, 2010
By the way, though I would love to be able to respond to some of the comments and questions specifically, most such attempts, specific references etc. are routinely filtered out. When 3 out of 4 are censored, then one tends to keep it short. I suppose some facts are too harsh for many sensitive ears and eyes here. In any case, suffice it to say, and as I had also mentioned many times before, I have never made any statement I could not back up with facts, you know the real ones. In fact, and ironically, much of what I have presented is supported in Armenian propaganda sources themselves.
istanbul
September 29, 2010
Dear Karo,
I am a Turk. When i read most of comments in this web site, i feel bad like Zeynep.
In istanbul i have been living with Armenian and Greek neighboors, when i’ve lived in London my boss and my roommate was Armenian, Turks and Armenian has no problem, as you think, in istanbul.
“with love and open heart” knowing that he continues to deny that he killed your mother, raped your sister, beheaded your brother, and slit off an unborn from his mother’s womb, just like Turks did to Armenians in 1915?
….just like Turks.
This is racism my friend, lots of Turks who visit this web site, they come here for share to your pains memories, and they try to emhpaty with you. I am one of them. But what we see mostly, amazing rasist words, like your comment, in Turkey Armenians are hopefull for the new realations between Armenia and Turkey, they sport protocols.
And if you really sensetive for the motherlands and human rights, how can you live in the Usa as an honored person.
I beilive that, Turkish and Armenian people worth the peace and a better future.
Regards to all.
istanbul
September 29, 2010
Dear Karo,
Not only Armenian people saw genocide in their history, Turkish people had genocide in Greece, in Bulgaria, in Russia , if you visit Turkey, please ask the people where are they from originally, you will see. But nobody talk this kind of things in Turkey. This is past my friend, of course we will not forget it. But we must look the future. You can not built future with hate.
Regards
Karo
September 30, 2010
Istanbul,
I am astonished. So what that on individual level you lived with Armenian and Greek neighbors and that your boss and roommate in London was an Armenian? What are we discussing here? That ordinary Armenians and ordinary Turks can’t have friendly individual relationships? Who denies this? Wasn’t I referring to the crime that your Ittihadist forefathers committed? What does this have to do with you having good relations with an Armenian friend? Why are you giving me this “racist” crap for a documented historical event of what Ottomans did to Armenians in 1915? Are you denying that in 1915 Ottoman Turks killed innocent Armenians? If you’re denying, then explain where did 2-2.5 million of Ottoman citizens of Armenian decent disappear? Are you hiding them in Turkey? What is “racist” about stating a historical fact that’s being recognized as genocide by the world governments? Are these governments also “racist”? Are foreign missionaries who witnessed slaughters of the Armenians in 1915-1923 also “racists”? Or according to you whoever says anything bad about a Turk is a “racist”? Finally, who, in your view, is more racist: a nation that demands justice for being victimized or a state that continues to deny that its predecessor government annihilated almost entire Armenian race?
I also believe that Turkish and Armenian people deserve a peace and a better future and for that a mere apology for annihilating the race is needed. It’s been 95 years and the apology is long overdue. And you’re dead wrong from the historical perspective in that Turkish people had “genocide” in Greece, in Bulgaria, and in Russia. How cynical this sounds… Were those lands originally Turkish? Or Ottomans conquered and enslaved indigenous Greeks, Bulgarians, Romanians, Albanians, Serbs, Arabs, Assyrians, and Armenians? These peoples’ fight against the Ottomans was a freedom fighting aimed at liberating their lands from the Turkish yoke. Turks engaged in wars (as with Russians and Greeks) or tried to suppress national liberation struggles (as in the case of Bulgarians) but it was not “genocide” of the Turks. How cunycal one must be… Turks didn’t live as millet in their own Ottoman empire and thus were not subjected to government orders to annihilate them. Armenians suffered immensely from such orders.
The past is the past but it needs to be acknowledged in the present. Whenever your government apologizes to the Armenians for committing a government-planned crime of genocide, then we’ll look to the future. Future is built on admitting mistakes and repentance, Istanbul. If you wish not to see hate towards your government on these pages, you’ll need to work to have it apologize to us. In the meantime nothing can stop ordinary Turks and Armenians to have friendly relations on an individual level.
arm_k
September 30, 2010
Murat,
The world does not revolve around Turks. In fact, Turks are relatively new nation from the historical perspective, a callous nomadic nation that secured its place in Asia Minor by means of waves of invasions and destruction brought upon indigenous nations from the steppes of Mongolia and Altay mountains. Knowing this you dare to advise us to “take a look at the map of Sevres and what was to be left for Turks if the story had ended some other way”? Well, how about the fact that there were never any Turks in sight on those lands before Seljuk and Mongol invasions? You occupied the lands of other peoples, enslaved them as millets in the Ottoman empire and now you’re worried about “what was to be left for Turks?” What a self-centered mentality! A total disregard for the historical rights of more sedentary, nobler, and more civilized ancient inhabitants of those lands. You only concern yourself with what might or might not happen to Muslims had the Treaty of Serves been materialized for indigenous peoples. What a narrow-minded, self-centered, self-aggrandizing mentality. You don’t bother asking yourself as to where those Muslims were at the times when such ancient nations as Assyrians, Greeks, and Armenians inhabited those lands, because your Turkish mental aptitude only allows you to focus on what’s yours not what could be a fairer scenario for all, doesn’t it? What an arrogance to say that had ancient people gotten their lands back it’d be “surely a fertile ground for WWIII.” What a striking acumen of a predicting capacity! How can a person that considers himself “civilized” be concerned with a hypothetical war but disregard a crime against humanity, such as genocide, that his nation has actually committed? “Ottomans paid a heavy price for their mistakes.” What an utterly cynical statement! Paid a heavy price like what? Lost three quarters of their ancestral lands in Mongolian steppes? Had 1.5 million innocent people slaughtered, mutilated, raped, burnt and buried alive, starved to death as a result of their government’s premeditated genocide? Had all their cultural heritage in the Altay mountains desecrated, transformed into churches, sheepfolds, or simply detonated? Had their houses, properties, bank accounts, valuables, insurance indemnities appropriated? What heavy price?
In the Ottoman Turkey Armenians were treated as a second class, a millet, constantly pillaged, massacred, abducted by the Turkish countrymen. With no rights, no representation, heavily and unjustly taxed. Nevertheless they managed to be trusted millet, fighting for Ottomans in the fronts more bravely than anyone else, even supporting the CUP initially in the hope that their rights will be respected. Nothing of the kind happened because Ottomans wanted to preserve superiority over their minorities. Just like other oppressed minorities: Serbs, Bulgarians, Greeks, Albanians, Montenegrins, Romanians, and Arabs, Armenians were no exception in their aspirations to throw off the loathed Ottoman yoke. However, they never organized, nor were they able or willing to organize, revolts aimed at overthrowing the government or mass murdering the Turks. A few revolutionaries tried to bring freedom and relief to their oppressed nation. Look at this from the Armenian perspective if you consider yourself a person with a wide worldview. Your nation is a genocide-perpetrator nation and your cheap tricks like using the term “crimes against humanity” in relation to the freedom-fighting activities of a few Armenian revolutionaries won’t change the reality. A few revolutionaries never organized extermination of your whole nation, forcible deportations, death marches, and wholesale starvation for women, children, and the elders. How cynical one should be to blame other nation for a never-committed crime, a crime that his own nation has committed!
Ottomans are history, but their crime against humanity was never recognized neither by them nor by all consecutive Turkish governments. On the contrary, the truth about the genocide of Armenians is hidden, distorted, misrepresented. That’s why we have cynical, heartless, and uncompassionate Turks like you on these pages. Armenians have nothing to be ashamed of our past to face it. Armenians didn’t slaughter your nation, starved them to death in millions. Armenians didn’t forcibly expel hundreds of thousands of Turks. Armenians didn’t steal their properties, convert their mosques into churches or just blow them up. We don’t deserve having a cynic like you on these pages advising us to face our 4000 year-long proud past. What a typically Turkish, cunning way of putting the blame on the victims in order to whitewash the barbarity of his own nation!
Karo
September 30, 2010
Karekin – Murat addressed his comment to you. Why aren’t you responding? Or you can only do lecturing to the Armenians?
david z
September 30, 2010
Ooh, wow! I guess we owe the Turks gratitude based on Murat’s predictions a la Nostradamus in that by wiping out millions of Armenians and other native Christian peoples of Asia Minor they saved the world from the World War III. I think we should also be indebted to Murat for making a prediction for us that civilized Christian Armenians would have acted in the same savage, barbarous ways as Ottoman Turks had they been given their ancestral lands in Asia Minor and just wipe the hell out all the Muslims living there. What an obtuse extrapolation of the self destructive mentality and behavior on the mentality and behavior of other, nobler peoples…
Murat
September 30, 2010
There is a little article in Turkish Daily Sabah, dated 2010/06/16, titled “Ermeni çeteleri diri diri yakmış”. It is about an actual mass grave. I have tried to give a link here or summarize it a few times, but to no avail. So I will just menton it here one more time, it is not that difficult to look up. I can give a much longer list of mass graves occasionally found in Eastern Anatolia, pictures and all, almost always filled with the remains of Muslim Turks who met their horrible end in the hands of Armenian fedayi. I mention this in regard to the earlier comments made about the “suprior” civilization of Armenians, and those “barbaric” Turks. Of course, one does not need to go all the way back a century, Karabag mass killings and ethnic cleansing provide plenty of opportunity for self-reflection.
arm_k
September 30, 2010
Murat,
Have decency, if you know what the notion stands for. What the Hell are you talking about? Do you mean to say that Ottoman Armenians, being largely peasant, impoverished, suppressed millet, barred from representation in legislatures, whose witness testimonies were disregarded in courts, who were prohibited to bear arms, could inflict similar destruction on Turks who made themselves a “superior” majority on the lands of other peoples? Who represented the government apparatus, Murat? Who possessed authority, law-enforcement, and military might in the Ottoman empire? Armenians or Turks? Doesn’t this fact already tell you which side was more capable of bringing destruction on the other? In which history book or a witness account have you come across a fact that Armenians planned and then executed a premeditated mass extermination of the Turks? Don’t make yourself the laughingstock of the whole community of nations. Were there interethnic, intercommunal clashes that resulted in the deaths of the Turks. Noone denies it. The life of Armenians, especially in the countryside was miserable, highly insecure. Throughout centuries they experienced non-stop pillages, abductions, murders, and thefts from the Turkish, Kurdish, and Circassian bands. So men organized the fedayi resistance because constant appeals of the Armenian intelligentsia and social groups to the Sultans resulted in no protective action on their part. Do you have any idea that the term “fedayi” is not even Armenian. In Arabic fidaiyin means “self-sacrificers.” The term fedayee was first used by Armenians in the Ottoman empire who formed guerrilla organizations and armed bands in reaction to the unchecked murder of Armenians and the pillage of Armenian villages by criminals, tribal Kurdish forces, and Hamidian Turkish guards during the reign of Bloody Sultan Abdul Hamid II and afterwards. Most of the fedayee leaders were members of the Armenian national liberation movement. What would you expect Armenians to do in the face of constant pillages and massacres? Be silent, act like sheep, and calmly follow the maraudering Turkish guards to a slaughterhouse? Where does this unreserved hatred originate in you, Murat, when it comes to the simple truth that other peoples are human beings, too, and many of them might have invested much more into the human civilization in literature, arts, architecture, sciences, business, trade and commerce? Does this spite surface in you because you know you won’t be able to compete with others in these fields?
Yes, Murat, extermination of Armenians by Ottoman Turks was a barbaric act, a “shameful act,” as even you own Mustafa Kemal admitted. The whole civilized world knows Ottoman Turks as barbaric because one can go insane if he or she visualizes what fiendish tortures, suffering, indescribable humiliation, and refined methods of death your forefathers have put to while exterminating Armenians. Are you able to embrace wider worldview and look at issues from both side, or you just don’t bother because no matter what, you think, you must defend Turks and Azeris because this is yours, right? Who’s right and who’s wrong doesn’t matter, the Hell with it. Your ethnic affinity and blood call are more important, right? Same with Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh). Don’t you even try to compare Turkish crime against humanity with the war over self-determination in Artsakh. Killings were on both sides simply because it was a full-scale war unleashed, by the way, by your beloved next-of-kins Azeris, nor Armenians. First, pogroms and massacres in Sumgait and Baku. Then ethnic cleansing in all Armenian villages surrounding Karabakh. And then constant shelling of towns and villages in Karabakh proper.
Regardless spite and intolerance that you spit on these pages, make no mistake: justice will be served. You may find unbelievable, but your government will apologize to Armenians for wiping out one of the most ancient civilizations inhabiting the Earth. Make no mistake.